The True Meaning of Easter - Fulton J. Sheen Audiobook
Language: EnglishKeywords: 
Christianity
 Nonfiction
 Religion
Shared by:rmoor
Written by
Read by Fulton J. Sheen
Format: M4B
In this enlightening and inspirational production, the story of Passion, Death, and Resurrection of Jesus is recounted in the magnificent English of the traditional Catholic Translation of the Bible, supported by the unforgettable words of Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen and underscored by the timeless beauty of the Gregorian chant and sweeping orchestral music reminiscent of a fine film score. This is one CD presentation you’ll definitely want to share with family and friends.
| Announce URL: | udp://tracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969/announce |
| This Torrent also has several backup trackers | |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.open-internet.nl:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.tiny-vps.com:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://open.demonii.si:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.torrent.eu.org:451/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://thetracker.org:80/announce |
| Tracker: | http://open.trackerlist.xyz:80/announce |
| Tracker: | http://tracker2.dler.org:80/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.ccc.de:80/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969 |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969 |
| Creation Date: | Sun, 14 Mar 2021 13:30:30 +0100 |
| This is a Multifile Torrent | |
| The True Meaning of Easter.m4b 26.31 MBs | |
| The True Meaning of Easter.jpg 55.38 KBs | |
| The True Meaning of Easter.nfo 1.15 KBs | |
| The True Meaning of Easter.cue 975 Bytes | |
| Combined File Size: | 26.37 MBs |
| Piece Size: | 32 KBs |
| Comment: | Updated by Christian Audiobooks |
| Encoding: | UTF-8 |
| Info Hash: | 13ec98936469dcaed11570a3297020f3e9f343c7 |
| Torrent Download: | Torrent Free Downloads |
| Tips: | Sometimes the torrent health info isn’t accurate, so you can download the file and check it out or try the following downloads. |
| Direct Download: | Start Direct Download |
| Tips: | You could try out alternative bittorrent clients. |
| Secured Download: | Download Files Now |
| AD: |
|







This post has 10 comments with rating of 4.3/5
March 14th, 2021
thanks so much
March 14th, 2021
Pagan fertility holiday. A more true meaning than the Christianity cult’s story. Sorry. Stories, since there are multiple, contradictory accounts of the “rebirth” of Christ in the compilation.
March 15th, 2021
Not even remotely true, Cap, ole buddy, which accounts for the Synoptic agreeing on the essentials. Only ideological cults - properly understood - impose a single, doctrinaire, monolithic version. As we know. Real human beings recall events with nuance and complexity, using their own experiences to inform discrete textures. An exclusive, undifferentiated construct would not help the Christian case one iota.
The power of its witness and spread - against all possible odds and persecutions - is historically undeniable.
As for that cool fertility hol idea, that’s what the logicians refer to as the genetic fallacy, or the fallacy of origins. One of the snazzier fallacies, of great renown.
March 16th, 2021
You’re not using the ‘genetic fallacy’ correctly caeser. If the captain was saying that easter was a pagan fertility holiday in a prejudicial fashion, that would be correct. He was merely noting its historical context. Chin chin.
March 16th, 2021
Chin chin yourself, Jason! I think I’m still on the secure terra that I luvs. On the one hand, attempting to interpolate or impose the pagan fertility hol theory into a specifically Jewish context can be said to be prejudicial and ahistorical. This would have been totally anathema to the Jews, Saul/Paul of Tarsus chief among them. Transcendent abstraction framed their perception, in this regard.
Although we do have to consider - at least for a comedy instant - that the Captain was being absolutely objective, non-prejudicial, and wholly well-disposed to religion here. And basing his assertions on genuine erudition. At least for a comedy instant.
You see this stuff permeating what I like to call “interweb skulrship” - essentially the Youniversity of Youtube.
Adler helpfully categorised the genetic fallacy as “the substitution of psychology for logic.”
March 17th, 2021
Im not sure i really got your drift in your answer. And whether the previous poster was prejudicial or not - speaking personally, i prefer not to judge the poster in the manner you have. I was merely noting that you used the term incorrectly.
March 17th, 2021
That’s fine - happy for any opportunity to clarify. Prejudicial on two fronts. Simply put: if you read the Captain’s post you can reasonably construe actual prejudice in the assessment. This would be entirely consistent with the other posts from the same source; so it’s not what you’d call a rush to judgment. Otherwise, there’s a few of us (we happy few, we band of siblings) who try to dial down the rampant hostility through the application of questionable humour. But humour has borders, we find.
The additional prejudice - the fallacy of origins itself - is grounded in the ahistorical assumptions regarding First Century Jewish intellectual categories. Their thought was, by definition, not based around pagan deities & their operation in the natural world. Their conception of G-d was characterised by transcendent abstractions - that the creator was wholly & completely unknowable, and not defined or controlled by such rites (fertility, etc.). Such procedures and ideas would have been entirely “anathema” - meaning blasphemous in this context - or abomination. Their custom was balanced on morality, law, and Covenant.
Intriguingly enough, on a reading of Classical intellectual history (Greeks & Romans) it’s quite doubtful that the pagans themselves invested any credence in such rites. St Paul persuaded them with philosophical argumentation, and this is the tradition which then took hold.
So: ahistorical. However, this is consistent with all who take a “light-touch” or excessively casual approach to historical knowledge. They merely project simplistic, superficial psychological categories onto to the agents of history. It doesn’t really take you very far in terms of historical insight. The factual record for them then becomes “Fake Nooze!” It’s so hot right now on the internet.
Happy St Patrick’s Day!
March 21st, 2021
Good stuff, thank you
March 22nd, 2021
@caesar there are none so blind as thosr that cannot see. I will agree to disagree, thank you.
March 23rd, 2021
Fair enough - but that ole chestnut can be applied in all directions. The test is the application of factual history, and sustainable argumentation based thereon. That’s the fun of this kind of thing.
Thanks again.
Add a comment